Standings | ||||
Wins | Losses | Ties | Pct | Contender |
2 | 2 | 3 | 0.500 | Intrade |
2 | 2 | 3 | 0.500 | Zogby |
Score | Date | State | Party | Intrade | Zogby | Winner | |
2-2-3 | 19-Jan | SC | Rep | McCain | McCain | McCain | |
2-2-2 | 19-Jan | NV | Dem | Obama | Clinton | Clinton | |
2-1-2 | 15-Jan | MI | Rep | McCain | 2-way tie | Romney | |
2-0-2 | 8-Jan | NH | Dem | Obama | Obama | Clinton | |
2-0-1 | 8-Jan | NH | Rep | McCain | McCain | McCain | |
2-0-0 | 3-Jan | IA | Dem | Obama | 3-way tie | Obama | |
1-0-0 | 3-Jan | IA | Rep | Huckabee | 2-way tie | Huckabee |
The election eve odds are here. I've revised the tiebreakers, though, having done them after a long day out of town while experiencing a caffeine crash.
The method for measuring predictiveness:
1. Look at the highest value Intrade contract and the highest Zogby poll (beyond error rate) to determine each source's predicted winner of a state contest
2. If neither Intrade nor Zogby predicts the winner, the candidate with the higher value between Intrade and Zogby (beyond the Zogby error rate) will win that contest.
No comments:
Post a Comment