| Standings | ||||
| Wins | Losses | Ties | Pct | Contender |
| 2 | 2 | 3 | 0.500 | Intrade |
| 2 | 2 | 3 | 0.500 | Zogby |
| Score | Date | State | Party | Intrade | Zogby | Winner | |
| 2-2-3 | 19-Jan | SC | Rep | McCain | McCain | McCain | |
| 2-2-2 | 19-Jan | NV | Dem | Obama | Clinton | Clinton | |
| 2-1-2 | 15-Jan | MI | Rep | McCain | 2-way tie | Romney | |
| 2-0-2 | 8-Jan | NH | Dem | Obama | Obama | Clinton | |
| 2-0-1 | 8-Jan | NH | Rep | McCain | McCain | McCain | |
| 2-0-0 | 3-Jan | IA | Dem | Obama | 3-way tie | Obama | |
| 1-0-0 | 3-Jan | IA | Rep | Huckabee | 2-way tie | Huckabee |
The election eve odds are here. I've revised the tiebreakers, though, having done them after a long day out of town while experiencing a caffeine crash.
The method for measuring predictiveness:
1. Look at the highest value Intrade contract and the highest Zogby poll (beyond error rate) to determine each source's predicted winner of a state contest
2. If neither Intrade nor Zogby predicts the winner, the candidate with the higher value between Intrade and Zogby (beyond the Zogby error rate) will win that contest.
0 comments:
Post a Comment